what’s with people calling us ‘sga discoursers’ it seems slightly……… homophobic
People whose discourse which is pro the term and concept of “sga” are sga discoursers
If you interpret that as “gay” that’s not us being homophobic, that’s you thinking that everyone agrees with you is gay. Which is biphobic.
You’re all constantly forcing “SGA” on bisexual and pansexual people who don’t want it and you obviously include us against our will but the second someone uses your own identifier in a way you don’t like it’s homophobic? Fuck off.
Also forcing it on nb people because sga implies a binary system of gender and that all nb people are “really” one gender or the other - in addition to a ton of bi/pan people who don’t like you narrowing down and discrediting their orientation to “basically gay” which is the only part of it you accept (which would be why sga discoursers don’t find non-sga bi people valid)
what’s with people assigning pathologising terminology sourced from conversion “therapy” to people who don’t choose that terminology for themselves and in many cases actively and vocally, explicitly, reject it
that seems slightly…. abusive, with a generous heaping of transphobia, biphobia, panphobia, nbphobia, and yes homophobia
(Source : guppykin, via ske-lee-ton-deactivated20170901)
